← Back to Blog

Routing Guides

Tender Rejection Rates Hit 13%. Protect Your Routing Guide.

Carriers are choosing which freight to move. Shippers who built their programs around price alone are the first to get skipped.

By FreightPlus Team · May 4, 2026 · 9 min read

Your routing guide may look fine on paper. But if national tender rejection rates are running at 13%, it is failing you in the lanes that matter most. That is where the U.S. freight market sits entering May 2026. Carriers have options. They are choosing which freight to move. And shippers who built their programs around price alone are the first to get skipped.

This post explains what tender rejection rates mean, why they are elevated right now, what it costs when your routing guide fails, and what shippers are doing to stay covered.

What Tender Rejection Rates Actually Tell You

A tender rejection rate is the percentage of load tenders your contracted carriers decline after you offer them a shipment. In a healthy freight market, that number runs between 3% and 5%. Routing guides start to stress around 7-8%. Above 10%, carriers are actively choosing freight, and yours is getting compared to other options before a driver rolls.

In early 2026, FreightWaves SONAR's Outbound Tender Reject Index pushed past 13%, well above its recent averages. That matches levels last seen in 2022, and industry data suggests it is not retreating quickly. Two structural forces are driving it:

Capacity fell. Demand did not fall with it. The result is a carrier market where your routing guide gets tested on every load, every day.

What Is Driving Rejections in 2026 Specifically

The capacity reduction story is important, but there is a second layer underneath it. Tariff-driven pull-forward behavior in late 2025 and early 2026 temporarily spiked freight demand as shippers rushed inventory into the U.S. ahead of cost increases. That demand has now flattened, creating what analysts are calling a freight demand "air pocket". The result is erratic volume patterns that make it hard for carriers to plan their networks.

Carriers respond to unpredictability by prioritizing their most reliable shippers. If your volume swings by 40% month to month, or if your tender-to-shipment ratio is inconsistent, you move down the priority list. That shows up as rejections before you ever know there was a ranking happening.

LTL is facing its own version of this. Major LTL carriers announced 2026 GRIs in the 4.9% to 5.9% range (Old Dominion 4.9%; ABF, Saia, and FedEx Freight 5.9%) and are holding pricing discipline, which means every GRI sticks unless you have the data and leverage to push back. The rate environment in both TL and LTL is moving against shippers who are passive about their carrier programs.

What Happens When Your Routing Guide Fails

When a carrier rejects your tender, you do not lose the shipment. You lose the rate.

Here is the cascade that follows a routing guide failure:

  1. Primary carrier rejects the tender.
  2. Secondary carrier rejects, or is not available in the lane.
  3. Tertiary carrier rejects or is at capacity.
  4. You call the spot market. Per DAT, the spot-to-contract spread has narrowed from 39 cents per mile to roughly 11 cents over the past year, the tightest gap since 2022.
  5. You pay 20-40% above your contracted rate to move freight you already priced at contract.

Repeat this across a quarter and it erases budget assumptions built on contract rates. Beyond cost, routing guide failure has a relationship cost. Carriers track your tender acceptance ratio from their side. If you tender and cancel frequently, or if you generate excessive detention, you become a low-priority shipper. Your loads move when capacity is available, not when you need them. That costs you in on-time delivery, not just dollars.

What "Shipper of Choice" Actually Means in Practice

Shipper of choice sounds like a marketing phrase. It is actually a set of measurable operational practices that determine where you rank when a carrier decides which loads to move. Carriers track the following on every shipper they work with:

  1. Tender acceptance rate. Do you tender loads you actually ship? Speculative tendering followed by cancellations hurts your score fast.
  2. Dwell time. How long does a driver wait at your dock? Carriers share dwell data internally. Shippers with high dwell times get deprioritized in tight markets.
  3. Load consistency. Are weights, dimensions, and pickup windows accurate? Surprises at the dock are expensive for carriers and they remember them.
  4. Payment terms. How fast do you pay? Carriers with cash flow pressure favor shippers on 30-day terms over those on 45 or 60.
  5. Communication quality. Are your shipment instructions complete? Is your team reachable when issues arise on the road?

None of these are secret. Carriers just use them to rank shippers when capacity gets tight. Being at the top of that list is not a favor. It is the result of consistent operational discipline on your end.

How to Audit Your Routing Guide Right Now

Before you can improve carrier relationships, you need to know where you stand today. A routing guide audit answers four questions:

  • What is your first-tender acceptance rate by lane? Healthy routing guides run at 90% or above. Below 80% on your core lanes is a red flag.
  • Which carriers are rejecting most frequently? Is it concentrated in certain lanes, certain days, or certain carriers? Pattern matters more than overall volume.
  • What are you paying on spot fallback loads versus contract? This number is your routing guide failure cost. Most shippers have never calculated it.
  • What is your average dock dwell time? Anything above 90 minutes is hurting your carrier score. Anything above two hours is actively damaging relationships.

Most of this data lives in your TMS or carrier invoices. It is rarely pulled together into a single view. If you have been accepting carrier rejections as a normal cost of doing business, there is likely 15-25% of your freight spend sitting in avoidable spot exposure.

Why Managed Transportation Changes the Equation

A managed transportation provider does not just manage your current carrier list. It brings a deeper carrier network, lane-level performance data across a much larger shipment base, and negotiating leverage that a mid-market shipper cannot build independently.

FreightPlus One manages more than 10,000 loads monthly across TL, LTL, and intermodal, with more than $300M in annual freight spend under management. That scale does two specific things for middle-market shippers in a tight capacity market:

  • Carrier prioritization. When carriers rank shippers, volume consistency matters. A shipper with $3M in annual freight spend ranks differently than a managed provider delivering $50M or more of consistent, reliable volume to that carrier. Managed transportation aggregates volume so your freight carries more weight in carrier decisions.
  • Fallback depth. A managed program maintains vetted, pre-qualified secondary and tertiary carrier options at the lane level. When your primary rejects, there is a qualified backup ready, not a cold call to the spot board at a 35% premium.

Shippers who moved to managed transportation typically cut their spot market exposure by 60-80% in the first year. Combined with freight audit, carrier consolidation, and benchmark-driven rate discipline, total freight cost reductions of 10-35% in the first year are common for shippers coming off unmanaged programs.

Practical Steps You Can Take in the Next 30 Days

If you are not ready to move to managed transportation yet, there are immediate actions that will improve your position with carriers:

  1. Pull tender rejection data by lane and carrier for the past 90 days. Identify your three worst-performing lanes.
  2. Calculate your spot fallback cost on those lanes. Compare it to what you would pay a carrier if you guaranteed volume and predictability.
  3. Reduce routing guide depth. Four or five carriers per lane with diluted volume each is weaker than two carriers with committed volume and a real relationship. Concentrate your commitment where you can.
  4. Set a dwell time goal internally. Sixty minutes is a reasonable target. Track it weekly and share it with your dock team. Carriers notice improvements quickly.
  5. Move your top carriers to 30-day payment terms. The relationship improvement is immediate and measurable in rejection rates within one quarter.
  6. Communicate volume changes in advance. When a spike or drop is coming, tell your carriers before it hits. They will reward the predictability with capacity.

These steps will not solve a 13% rejection rate market on their own, but they will move you up the priority list for the carriers you depend on most.

What to Expect for the Rest of 2026

Capacity is not loosening quickly. FMCSA regulatory enforcement is ongoing. The CDL school shutdowns mean the new driver pipeline is constrained for at least 12-18 months. LTL carriers are holding pricing discipline with announced GRIs of 4.9-5.9% across the major lines and no pullback in sight. And tariff-driven demand volatility is making volume forecasting harder than it has been in years.

The shippers who stabilize their routing guides in Q2 will be better positioned for whatever the second half brings than those who wait for a service crisis to force action. Carrier relationship investment and multi-modal flexibility are not strategic priorities for next year. They are operational necessities for this quarter.

If your tender rejection rate is above 8%, or if you are not sure what it is, that is the first thing worth finding out.

Want to see what your routing guide is actually costing you?

FreightPlus runs a no-cost freight spend analysis for qualified shippers. We will show you your carrier performance by lane, your spot market exposure, and where a managed program delivers the most immediate value. If the numbers do not make sense, we will tell you that too.